If you are like me (or anyone of The Rookies, really), you are slowly coming down off your high from the 72 hours of pure black tar heroin that is known as the NCAA Tournament first two rounds. I must preface this by saying that I’m not complaining, but just noticing, as regardless of upsets or not, these are the best four days of the sports year. That said, where are the upsets? As I perused my smoldering wreck of a bracket, I noticed that by simply picking the team with the lower seed number in every game, I could’ve picked 14 of the Sweet 16 games correctly. Of course, I didn’t, and only got 12 right.
Of course, one might say that this year is an aberration. However, over the past 10 years, there has never been a Sweet 16 with less than four teams seeded above 5. This year there is one. Add this to four number 1 seeds making the Final Four last year and the paucity of higher-seeded teams making runs in 2007 (only Winthrop made the 16 as a double-digit seed), and you have what John Gasaway, who knows a lot more about this than I, has termed the beginning of “The Era Of Chalk”.
Some would argue that this is not a bad thing, as the games next weekend in the Sweet 16 and Elite 8 are sure to be amazing basketball games. This argument, however, misses the point of March Madness. We get plenty of chances to see Top 10 and even Top 5 teams squaring off against each other during the regular season; what we don’t get to see are the best Mid-Majors taking on the titans of the game on a neutral floor, with all the pressure of March bearing down. Why don’t we see these? The best teams won’t schedule games against the best mid-majors (and if they do, they are surely home games). The tournament is about Cinderellas, like George Mason, Davidson, and Western Kentucky, and the Final Four. This year, there’s no Cinderella-sorry Arizona, you don’t count. March Madness is still the best sporting event, but if The Era of Chalk persists, the fun will be severely devalued.