<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hoc-key Re-cap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.therookiesblog.com/2009/11/21/5260/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.therookiesblog.com/2009/11/21/5260/</link>
	<description>&#34;We don&#039;t write, we kvetch.&#34; &#34;Well, we make ideas.&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 08:03:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Skating Tomato</title>
		<link>http://www.therookiesblog.com/2009/11/21/5260/comment-page-1/#comment-10477</link>
		<dc:creator>Skating Tomato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therookiesblog.com/?p=5260#comment-10477</guid>
		<description>Fair enough, I&#039;m just saying that if the Hawks were even going to think of another 10+ year deal after what happened when they signed Hossa, it might have been a good idea to make sure their team&#039;s answers to Crosby and Malkin were the ones getting first crack at it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough, I&#8217;m just saying that if the Hawks were even going to think of another 10+ year deal after what happened when they signed Hossa, it might have been a good idea to make sure their team&#8217;s answers to Crosby and Malkin were the ones getting first crack at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rovitz</title>
		<link>http://www.therookiesblog.com/2009/11/21/5260/comment-page-1/#comment-10450</link>
		<dc:creator>rovitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therookiesblog.com/?p=5260#comment-10450</guid>
		<description>Duncan Keith is the best D man they have, better than Seabrook, and 10x&#039;s better than that waste of money Campbell.  Keith is great on O, and terrific defending, i would have no complaints about locking him up long term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duncan Keith is the best D man they have, better than Seabrook, and 10x&#8217;s better than that waste of money Campbell.  Keith is great on O, and terrific defending, i would have no complaints about locking him up long term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
